Tag Archives: movies

Why You Should Value Physical Media

Living room with a sofa, an open book, popcorn bowl, a mug, candles, and a lamp in front of a large bookshelf filled with movies or books
A warm, cozy living room featuring a sofa, books, popcorn, and soft lighting.

Say what you will about the state of streaming services (and there’s a LOT of legitimately bad things to say), but it definitely has value. There are shows and movies that never would’ve been made in the pre-streaming era. There are also shows that never would’ve found the audience they did had it not been for streaming.

I can attest to this. I bought a Netflix subscription in 2010. And it’s through Netflix that I discovered shows like “Parks and Recreation,” “Breaking Bad,” and “Bojack Horseman.” Some of those shows were airing on regular TV at the time, but I didn’t get into them until I was able to binge entire seasons on my own time. For that, I will always be grateful.

Unfortunately, streaming services have been on the front lines of the “enshitification” process that has consumed so many industries. Netflix is no longer the one-stop shop for watching all your favorite shows. Now, you have to purchase multiple streaming services, which are constantly increasing their prices and removing content. It’s already at a point where the cumulative cost of streaming services exceeds the cost of cable. Even when these streaming services are unprofitable, they continue to propagate. And they continue to squeeze every last penny they can from consumers.

This is why physical media still matters. Those boxes of DVDs, VHS tapes, Blu-Rays, and Laserdisks may take up space and collect dust. But they still hold a great deal of value. And as the enshitification process accelerates with streaming, that value will likely continue to increase. It’s not the same value as an investment. These aren’t vintage baseball cards or rare comic books. This is simply the media you love in a tangible, physical form that you can watch without a monthly subscription or an internet connection.

If you’re under a certain age, that may not seem remarkable. If you’re around my age or older, you understand on some levels why this is necessary. Before streaming, this was all we had to preserve the shows we loved. TV has been finite for most of its history. If you miss an episode or can’t follow a show, your only option was to get the VHS tapes or the box set of DVDs. Playing, organizing, and storing them was a pain. But they were yours.

They couldn’t be removed from a platform.

They couldn’t be frozen in an account.

They couldn’t purged due to a rights dispute.

These shows were now yours to possess without paying a regular subscription to a company. There will always be value in that kind of control. There will also be efforts to undermine that value. Before streaming, TV and movie studios actively fought against the VCR. They believed it undermined their business model. And it did to some extent, but they adapted their model. The same thing happened with music in wake of Napster. Expect every streaming company to do the exact same thing.

We’re already seeing it in subtle ways. Just take a moment to look at your computer, laptop, or tablet. Does it have a DVD/Blu-Ray player? It probably doesn’t. Chances are you need to buy an extra attachment for that. And most of the attachments are of poor quality. For most people, their primary method for playing physical media is gaming consoles like the Playstation or the X-Box.

But that may not be an option for much longer. The current console cycle is set to end. And there are numerous rumors that the next iteration of these consoles won’t even have a disk drive. That means the primary way of playing physical media will become even more limited.

That’s why it’s important to be proactive. If you don’t have a DVD/Blu-Ray players at all, look into getting one. If you can, buy one with a built-in screen. That’s what I invested in. I don’t use it too often, but I treat it like an umbrella or a condom. It’s better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

Also, once a year I take stock in my favorite shows and how I access them. If there’s a particular show that is leaving a streaming service or is hard to find, I get the box set. Shows like “Parks and Recreation” or every X-Men animated series ever made have a secure place in my collection. And I intend to hold onto them, even if they remain on streaming platforms.

There’s no question that streaming services have their place. Their accessibility and convenience is beyond dispute. But if you truly love a show or movie, don’t assume that it’ll always be on a streaming service. Don’t even assume it’ll always be accessible. Make sure the shows and movies you love most have a physical form. This isn’t some hipster mentality about the quality of old formats like vinyl. This is about understanding that as great as streaming can be, there will never be a substitute for having something you love take a tangible form.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Why The Supergirl Movie Failed To Connect With Audiences

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

Supergirl (2026) was a flop at the box office. It was not well-received by critics or audiences. While I personally enjoyed it, I don’t deny it had serious flaws that ensured it was never going to succeed. In this video, I break down those flaws and how they go beyond the shortcomings of this movie. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under DC Comics, Jack's World, superhero comics, superhero movies, television, YouTube

Space Jam Vs. Space Jam 2: When A Sequel Misses The Point

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

Space Jam was the quintessential 90s movie. It gave us Michael Jordan in his prime, the Looney Toons, and a simple, but fun experience.

Space Jam 2: A New Legacy tried to follow up with Lebron James. But what it delivered was…not nearly as fun. In fact, it completely missed the point of what the first did so well.

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, movies, YouTube

Blame Us (Not Netflix) For What Movies Are Becoming

In January 2026, Matt Damon recounted how Netflix, one of the biggest distributers of movies on the planet, wants filmmakers to restate plot multiple times for an audience. Their reason for doing this has nothing to do with the content or artistic vision of a film. It’s just Netflix accommodating the sizable chunk of their audience who stream movies while also looking at their phones or tablets.

For accomplished filmmakers, this probably feels like studios and executives tampering with their art. It’s people in offices completely detached from the creative process trying to micromanage a product for consumers. The mere idea of changing their vision to accommodate a studio may seem inherently dirty. Since few creatives have the same influence as Matt Damon or Ben Affleck, they would probably capitulate to these demands.

A lot has been made of these remarks. Filmmakers, movie buffs, and general audiences of all kinds recoil at the idea of Netflix making such demands. The idea of studios and profit-hungry executives undermining art in the name of shareholders feels wrong on so many levels. But let’s take a step back from those feelings and share a brief bit of introspection.

Say what you want about Netflix, their business model, and capitalism in general. But they are not to blame for making such demands of filmmakers.

We are to blame.

We are the reason for this ongoing trend in movies and TV.

We are actively making it worse and companies like Netflix are just responding to this.

This isn’t a matter of opinion or principle. This is a well-documented phenomenon among the average consumer. People don’t just watch a movie or TV show anymore. They turn it on, watch for a bit, and casually do things on their phones or tablets as it plays. It rarely has anything to do with the quality or coherence of a movie. It’s just what people do these days.

I freely admit I do this. There are times when I’ll turn on a movie or TV show and casually do things on my iPad. Most of the time, I do this with movies or shows I’ve already seen multiple times. I also do it frequently while watching live sports, mostly during commercials or breaks in the action. Sometimes, if something comes up, I’ll just pause it so I can focus. But that’s fairly rare.

There have even been times where I don’t really engage with what I’m watching at all. I’ll have a movie, show, or sport on while I’m actively playing a video game. But I only do this with certain types of content. For something like a baseball game in the early innings or stand-up comedy specials, you don’t need to be continually watching. You can do other things and people did so before smartphones. It’s just more common now because smartphones enable us to do more things.

And I know I’m not the only one who does this. I’ve observed this with friends, relatives, and even people in a movie theater. Call it what you want. Lament how our attention spans are shrinking and our appreciation for real art is faltering. But that’s overly simplistic. It’s just another way of whining about people using their phones all the time.

I don’t deny that can be a problem. But it also ignores the bigger picture. People who complain act like humans thought, acted, and felt differently in the past. I imagine if people had smartphones at Woodstock in 1969, they would’ve used them the same way. If the average movie-goer had smartphones in the 1980s, they probably would’ve casually scrolled their social media feeds while Indiana Jones outran a boulder. To claim otherwise is to just be out of touch and smug.

No matter how you feel about this phenomenon, it’s misguided to blame Netflix. They didn’t create the smartphone. They didn’t put the idea in our heads to just use movies and TV shows as background noise while doomscrolling. They’re just responding to what their customers’ behavior. That’s what capable, competent businesses do.

If you want them to do something else, then it’s on us, the customer, to give them new incentives. If we are unwilling or unable to do so in an organized manner, then that’s not the fault of Netflix. It’s our fault. We either acknowledge that or we continue to make it worse by whining.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, movies, technology, television

Who The Hell Is Sadie Sink Playing In The MCU? (And Who I Hope She’s Playing)

Sadie Sink is one of the most prominent young actresses in Hollywood right now. Her breakout role as Max Mayfield in “Stranger Things” made her a star. For me personally, that role made her one of my favorite actresses. Just watch this scene and try not to get chills.

Naturally, her success led to being cast in more prominent roles. The biggest thus far has been “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” With “Stranger Things” ending after Season 5, Sadie Sink is poised to join the Marvel Cinematic Universe. And depending on how things play out, it could cement her as one of the biggest, brightest stars in the industry.

However, we don’t yet know who Sink will be playing in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” That has been a closely guarded secret since her casting was confirmed. Months later after this announcement, it was later confirmed that Sink will also be in “Avengers: Secret Wars.” So, whoever she’s playing in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” will not be a one-off in the mold of Mysterio, Hela, or MODOK.

This hints that her role will be significant. But even in interviews, Sink has been very careful not to drop any hints, going so far as to say that her character need not have red hair. That could be a red herring. Or it could be a hint. Nobody knows at the moment. Even known insiders have given conflicting information.

One early theory indicated she would play Shathra, a lesser-known Spider-Man villain who tends to move between timelines and universes. Given how this movie is supposed to stem directly from the events of “Avengers: Doomsday,” that could make sense. But given how obscure this character is, I think that’s unlikely.

It’s much more likely that she’ll play a variation of Mayday Parker, the daughter of Spider-Man. Given that Tobey McGuire has also been rumored to appear in “Avengers: Doomsday,” it would make sense. If the multiverse is irreparably broken, he would want nothing more than for his daughter to survive. The only flaw in that theory is that in “Spider-Man: No Way Home,” Tobey’s Spider-Man did not hint at all that he had a daughter. He said he and Mary Jane had a complicated relationship, but they made it work. That’s ambiguous, but not definitive.

If I had to put odds on who I think Sink is most likely to play, the best odds would go to Firestar. She’s a mutant most often associated with the X-Men. But she’s probably most famous for being a member of “Spider-Man and his Amazing Friends,” the classic Marvel animated series from the early 1980s. She has connections to Spider-Man. And Marvel Studios has been laying a foundation to bring mutants into the MCU.

By most measures, Firestar makes sense. She could be an ally to Peter, who will definitely need them after the events of “Spider-Man: No Way Home.” She could function as a multiverse refugee if things in “Avengers: Doomsday” get as messy as they’re rumored to be. And that would also leave her in a position to play a role in “Avengers: Secret Wars.” Depending on how she handles this role, it could open the door for her to be included in future X-Men movies.

However, there’s one role in particular that I really hope for Sadie Sink. I think it’s somewhat less likely than her playing Firestar. But it’s also much more prominent and would position Sink to play a major role in the MCU for years to come. And that role is none other than fire and life incarnate herself, Jean Grey.

Now, I freely admit that Jean Grey is one of my favorite characters of all time. And I judge any and all X-Men movies based on how they handle Jean Grey. As a result, she’s a significant reason why I didn’t care for the original X-Men trilogy.

That being said, nothing would make me happier than to see Sadie Sink make her first appearance as Jean Grey in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” Even though Jean isn’t closely associated with Spider-Man, it would make sense, given the context of this movie.

This is a world where everyone has forgotten Peter Parker, including MJ and Ned. He’s all alone and trying to be Spider-Man in a world with next to no support. Who better to help restore the memories of those he cares about than one of the most powerful psychics in the multiverse?

Someone with Sadie Sink’s profile would be perfect for a role like Jean. It’s not even a new idea. Even before Sadie Sink was cast in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” there were numerous rumors that she was in the running to play Jean Grey in a future MCU X-Men movie. Sadie has even acknowledged some of those rumors without giving any credence to them.

Based on what little has leaked regarding this movie, there aren’t many hints regarding Sink’s character. But thus far, those leaks don’t indicate that her hair color is being changed. There’s also no hint that she’s wearing an identifiable costume or uniform. So, she could still be Mayday, Firestar, or even a variant of Gwen Stacy (although I think that’s unlikely since Gwen still has a major role in the Spider-Verse movies).

But my hope is that she ends up playing Jean Grey. I think it would be so appropriate that she would be the next step towards bringing the X-Men into the MCU. She could help provide the foundation for the next generation of X-Men movies. Someone of her caliber could do justice to such an iconic character.

I’m still bracing for disappointment. I still think the odds aren’t great that Sadie will be Jean. But if she ends up in that role, the multiverse as we know it will be a better place.

Leave a comment

Filed under Marvel, Marvel Cinematic Universe, movies, X-men

My Trip To New York Comic Con 2025

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In this video, I share some of the photos and clips I took from my trip to New York Comic Con 2025. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, New York Comic Con, YouTube

The First (But Not Last) AI Actress Is A Thing

Have you heard of Tilly Norwood? She’s a beautiful young actress who is just starting to make her presence felt in Hollywood. She hasn’t been in much, but she’s already negotiating with talent agents to get bigger roles.

There’s just one major issue. Tilly Norwood isn’t a real person. She’s an entirely AI-generated persona.

Naturally, that doesn’t sit well with real life actors and unions. There is already a concerted effort to prevent Tilly Norwood from being cast in anything beyond your typical AI slop content. I completely understand this sentiment. I don’t blame anyone who works in Hollywood for being concerned about this. However, having covered the rise in AI for years, I’m comfortable making this prediction.

Tilly Norwood will eventually be cast in major movies and TV shows.

Other AI actors like her will be cast, as well.

Traditional actors and actresses will hate it. A sizable chunk of the audience will hate it as well. But this is going to happen. It was always going to happen the moment generative AI reached a certain level of refinement. A big reason for that involves money, as tends to be the case in Hollywood and most other industries. But there’s another reason that’s worth highlighting.

Dollar for dollar, movies and TV shows are getting more expensive to produce. This isn’t just due to inflation, unions, and the “personalities” that tend to comes with Hollywood. The logistics involved with making media has become bloated and inefficient. We’re no longer in an era in which media can only go through certain channels, be it TV and movie theaters. Thanks to streaming media, as well as online content like YouTube and Tiktok, the competition for eyeballs has never been greater.

Unless you’re a big budget blockbuster with a massive distribution network, such as Disney or Warner Bros., it’s harder to make content that turns a profit. The scale, resources, and personnel required to produce a movie or show is such that it’s limiting. Add to that the general enshitification of streaming media and the current model for producing content just isn’t sustainable.

Generative AI, as much as it is derided, offers a significant cost advantage. On top of that, an AI actor or actress is less likely to get accused of harassment, arrested for public intoxication, or go on some anti-sematic rant during a routine traffic stop. And for certain Hollywood agents, you can’t put a price on that kind of assurance.

But the question remains. Will audiences accept AI actors? Will the content they produce actually be worth watching?

A lot of people will probably refuse to watch anything with Tilly Norwood or anything like her out of principle. But what happens when AI gets to a point where it’s hard to tell if a person is AI generated? There are already AI tools like SORA and Veo3 that make extremely realistic videos of people who look and sound real. This is one element of AI that is not in the distant future. It’s here and it’s evolving fast.

It’s not yet clear what kind of career Tilly Norwood will have. She may never show up in anything mainstream. But like it or not, she marks the first step in a new trend with AI. We don’t know where it will lead. Hollywood is already undergoing significant change. Technology like this is only going to accelerate that change in ways we can’t imagine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, movies, technology, television

The Naked Gun Is The Perfect Comedy

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

There’s no need to debate this.

There’s no point in arguing this.

The Naked Gun is the perfect comedy. That’s it. There’s no way to claim otherwise. It is perfect in every conceivable way and deserves to be celebrated as such.

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube

Team America World Police: The Greatest (And Most Honest) Patriotic Movie Of All Time

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In the spirit of America and all it stands for, I made this video to celebrate a very special movie that truly captures the essence of patriotism. That movie is Team America: World Police.

Yes, it has puppets, profanity, and barfing. But it is the most genuine, honest portrayal of American patriotism in the history of cinema. And that makes it worth celebrating. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under funny, Jack's World, movies, YouTube

How To Train Your Dragon: Why Hiccup Is The Ultimate Underdog Hero

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In this video, I highlight a hero’s journey, as well as an underdog story. Both stories, on their own, have plenty of appeal. But it’s rare to see them rolled into one character and one story.

But “How To Train Your Dragon” did just that with Hiccup, a character who embodies everything we love about underdogs and heroes. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, movies, noble masculinity, YouTube