Tag Archives: TV

Blame Us (Not Netflix) For What Movies Are Becoming

In January 2026, Matt Damon recounted how Netflix, one of the biggest distributers of movies on the planet, wants filmmakers to restate plot multiple times for an audience. Their reason for doing this has nothing to do with the content or artistic vision of a film. It’s just Netflix accommodating the sizable chunk of their audience who stream movies while also looking at their phones or tablets.

For accomplished filmmakers, this probably feels like studios and executives tampering with their art. It’s people in offices completely detached from the creative process trying to micromanage a product for consumers. The mere idea of changing their vision to accommodate a studio may seem inherently dirty. Since few creatives have the same influence as Matt Damon or Ben Affleck, they would probably capitulate to these demands.

A lot has been made of these remarks. Filmmakers, movie buffs, and general audiences of all kinds recoil at the idea of Netflix making such demands. The idea of studios and profit-hungry executives undermining art in the name of shareholders feels wrong on so many levels. But let’s take a step back from those feelings and share a brief bit of introspection.

Say what you want about Netflix, their business model, and capitalism in general. But they are not to blame for making such demands of filmmakers.

We are to blame.

We are the reason for this ongoing trend in movies and TV.

We are actively making it worse and companies like Netflix are just responding to this.

This isn’t a matter of opinion or principle. This is a well-documented phenomenon among the average consumer. People don’t just watch a movie or TV show anymore. They turn it on, watch for a bit, and casually do things on their phones or tablets as it plays. It rarely has anything to do with the quality or coherence of a movie. It’s just what people do these days.

I freely admit I do this. There are times when I’ll turn on a movie or TV show and casually do things on my iPad. Most of the time, I do this with movies or shows I’ve already seen multiple times. I also do it frequently while watching live sports, mostly during commercials or breaks in the action. Sometimes, if something comes up, I’ll just pause it so I can focus. But that’s fairly rare.

There have even been times where I don’t really engage with what I’m watching at all. I’ll have a movie, show, or sport on while I’m actively playing a video game. But I only do this with certain types of content. For something like a baseball game in the early innings or stand-up comedy specials, you don’t need to be continually watching. You can do other things and people did so before smartphones. It’s just more common now because smartphones enable us to do more things.

And I know I’m not the only one who does this. I’ve observed this with friends, relatives, and even people in a movie theater. Call it what you want. Lament how our attention spans are shrinking and our appreciation for real art is faltering. But that’s overly simplistic. It’s just another way of whining about people using their phones all the time.

I don’t deny that can be a problem. But it also ignores the bigger picture. People who complain act like humans thought, acted, and felt differently in the past. I imagine if people had smartphones at Woodstock in 1969, they would’ve used them the same way. If the average movie-goer had smartphones in the 1980s, they probably would’ve casually scrolled their social media feeds while Indiana Jones outran a boulder. To claim otherwise is to just be out of touch and smug.

No matter how you feel about this phenomenon, it’s misguided to blame Netflix. They didn’t create the smartphone. They didn’t put the idea in our heads to just use movies and TV shows as background noise while doomscrolling. They’re just responding to what their customers’ behavior. That’s what capable, competent businesses do.

If you want them to do something else, then it’s on us, the customer, to give them new incentives. If we are unwilling or unable to do so in an organized manner, then that’s not the fault of Netflix. It’s our fault. We either acknowledge that or we continue to make it worse by whining.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, movies, technology, television

Bob’s Burgers – Why The Wolf Of Wharf Street Is The Best Halloween Episode

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

Bob’s Burgers is one of my favorite shows. And one of the reasons for that is how well it does holiday episodes. The Christmas and Thanksgiving episodes tend to have the most drama, but Halloween also inspires a special kind of Belcher family fun.

And the episode that best embodies this spirit is “The Wolf of Wharf Street.” I’ll go on record as saying it’s the best Halloween episode of the show and it raises the bar for every other show. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under Bob's Burgers, Jack's World, YouTube

The First (But Not Last) AI Actress Is A Thing

Have you heard of Tilly Norwood? She’s a beautiful young actress who is just starting to make her presence felt in Hollywood. She hasn’t been in much, but she’s already negotiating with talent agents to get bigger roles.

There’s just one major issue. Tilly Norwood isn’t a real person. She’s an entirely AI-generated persona.

Naturally, that doesn’t sit well with real life actors and unions. There is already a concerted effort to prevent Tilly Norwood from being cast in anything beyond your typical AI slop content. I completely understand this sentiment. I don’t blame anyone who works in Hollywood for being concerned about this. However, having covered the rise in AI for years, I’m comfortable making this prediction.

Tilly Norwood will eventually be cast in major movies and TV shows.

Other AI actors like her will be cast, as well.

Traditional actors and actresses will hate it. A sizable chunk of the audience will hate it as well. But this is going to happen. It was always going to happen the moment generative AI reached a certain level of refinement. A big reason for that involves money, as tends to be the case in Hollywood and most other industries. But there’s another reason that’s worth highlighting.

Dollar for dollar, movies and TV shows are getting more expensive to produce. This isn’t just due to inflation, unions, and the “personalities” that tend to comes with Hollywood. The logistics involved with making media has become bloated and inefficient. We’re no longer in an era in which media can only go through certain channels, be it TV and movie theaters. Thanks to streaming media, as well as online content like YouTube and Tiktok, the competition for eyeballs has never been greater.

Unless you’re a big budget blockbuster with a massive distribution network, such as Disney or Warner Bros., it’s harder to make content that turns a profit. The scale, resources, and personnel required to produce a movie or show is such that it’s limiting. Add to that the general enshitification of streaming media and the current model for producing content just isn’t sustainable.

Generative AI, as much as it is derided, offers a significant cost advantage. On top of that, an AI actor or actress is less likely to get accused of harassment, arrested for public intoxication, or go on some anti-sematic rant during a routine traffic stop. And for certain Hollywood agents, you can’t put a price on that kind of assurance.

But the question remains. Will audiences accept AI actors? Will the content they produce actually be worth watching?

A lot of people will probably refuse to watch anything with Tilly Norwood or anything like her out of principle. But what happens when AI gets to a point where it’s hard to tell if a person is AI generated? There are already AI tools like SORA and Veo3 that make extremely realistic videos of people who look and sound real. This is one element of AI that is not in the distant future. It’s here and it’s evolving fast.

It’s not yet clear what kind of career Tilly Norwood will have. She may never show up in anything mainstream. But like it or not, she marks the first step in a new trend with AI. We don’t know where it will lead. Hollywood is already undergoing significant change. Technology like this is only going to accelerate that change in ways we can’t imagine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, movies, technology, television

Hank Hill: How To Be Stubborn Yet Reasonable

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

TV dads are known for being stubborn, dense, and foolish. But some do manage to stand out for all the right reasons. They’re still stubborn, but that doesn’t prevent them from having greater depth.

Hank Hill from King of the Hill is a perfect example of this. He is very much defined by how stubborn and uncompromising he is. But he has also been shown to be reasonable. And that helps make him such a better character while also providing for some endearing comedy.

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube

The Critic Revival: Could It Really Work?

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

This video entertains the possibility of a revival of The Critic, a remarkable, yet forgotten show from the 90s. After my previous video, both Jon Lovitz and Al Jean came out in support of a revival. And while I’d love to see Jay Sherman return, I think it’s worth asking whether such a revival could work.

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube

Common Side Effects: A Bold Show With Bolder Ideas

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In this video, I highlight a remarkable new show called Common Side Effects. It’s rare for a show to come along and really impress me after just one season. But this show, which debuted on Adult Swim, really raised the bar for just how great adult animation can be. And I highly encourage everyone to check it out for themselves. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under health, Jack's World, television, YouTube

The Critic: A Forgotten (But Relevant) 90s Animated Gem

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

This video revisits and celebrates The Critic, one of my favorite shows from the 90s. This brief, but memorable animated series was unique in so many ways. It was even ahead of its time in how it approached modern movies. Even though it ended too soon, it left quite a mark that’s worth exploring.

Leave a comment

Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube

Why Bob’s Burgers Is The Perfect Comfort Show

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

This video explores why and how Bob’s Burgers became the perfect comfort show. For me personally, it’s become the show I often turn to when I just want to watch something simple, wholesome, and fun. It’s also one of those rare shows that sets itself apart from other animated shows for all the right reasons.

Plus, it has Gene Belcher. What more could you want?

Leave a comment

Filed under comedy, funny, television

Batman The Animated Series: Batman Vs. Three Bored Billionaires

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In this video, I highlight and explore one of my favorite episodes of Batman: The Animated Series. While Batman has one of the best rogue’s gallery in all of comics, this episode had him clash with a different kind of enemy.

Like Bruce Wayne, they’re billionaires.

Unlike Bruce Wayne, they choose to be villains.

But it’s why they make such a choice that’s truly remarkable. And the nature of that choice does a lot to affirm why Batman’s story is so powerful. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under DC Comics, superhero comics, television, YouTube

Ode To “Airplane!” For Always Making Me Laugh

These days, it’s easy to look back on old movies and TV shows you once found funny and cringe. Sometimes, it’s just part of changing trends. Sometimes, it’s just part of getting older. What you found hilarious when you were 10-years-old isn’t going to be as funny when you’re 40. It’s just a sad fact of life.

But then, there’s a movie like “Airplane!” And I submit that, in terms of comedies that have aged like the finest of wines, this movie is the gold standard.

I certainly understand that comedy and tastes are objective. I also don’t doubt that some people will watch a movie like this, not get the jokes, or take offense to it. But I would also argue that, while you can levy those kinds of criticisms about many comedies from that era, you can’t reasonably apply it to “Airplane!

This movie isn’t just a classic comedy gem from the early 1980s. It’s one of those rare movies that takes a simple, but effective approach at being funny. It doesn’t try to be too smart for its own good. It doesn’t try to be too crude, so as only to appeal to a specific demographic and/or stoners. It just uses the basics of what makes good, endearing comedy and runs with it.

The story itself is not really that complicated. A traumatized ex-fighter pilot, Ted Striker, tries to win back his stewardess girlfriend, Elaine Dickinson, before she moves away and leaves him for good. He follows her to the airport, ends up on a plane with her to Chicago, and just happens to be there when disaster strikes and the flight crew falls ill. Along the way, some truly remarkable comedy gold ensues.

In essence, this movie is largely a parody of common tropes from that era regarding romance, war, and disaster movies. It also used the premise of a far more serious, less funny movie from 1957 called “Zero Hour!” But you don’t have to have seen that movie to appreciate plot, jokes, and comedy of “Airplane!” You just have to have the smallest semblance of a sense of humor.

It does get crude at times, but not so crude as to be juvenile.

It does get quirky with recurring gags, but it never overuses them.

It also gets more than a little suggestive at times, but not to the point where it needs to be rated R.

This movie came out before I was born. However, it was a movie my parents loved. Every time my mother watched it, she would keel over and laugh. I was only around nine-years-old when I first saw it. And even though some of the jokes flew over my head, I still found it funny.

Years later, when I rewatched it, I laughed even harder once I actually got the jokes. To this day, I can re-watch the movie any time of year and still find it hilarious. I still crack up at the scenes that involve speaking Jive. I still laugh every time Leslie Nielson says “And don’t call me Shirley!” And the autopilot steals the show every time.

While I wouldn’t go so far as to call “Airplane!” my favorite movie or even my favorite comedy, I can’t recall a single movie or TV show that has consistently made me laugh over the years. And at a time when so many other TV shows and movies are aging poorly, it just makes me appreciate “Airplane!” that much more.

So, for that, I thank David and Jerry Zucker, and all those involved in making this movie, for giving the world this timeless comedy gem. And if you haven’t seen it yet and are in the mood for some quality comedy, give “Airplane!” a watch. If laughter truly is good for the soul, this movie should give you plenty of nourishment.

Leave a comment

Filed under movies