This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.
This video is a CreepyPasta story I wrote and narrated myself about what happens to a young man when he finds out he’s half-Incubus. Enjoy!
This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.
In this video, I once again revisit 90s MTV gem, Daria. And this time, I focus on the evolution and (partial) redemption of her younger, super-shallow, super-popular sister, Quinn.
Now, I freely admit that Quinn Morgendorffer was the character I hated most on this show. For the first two seasons, she was insufferable. But towards the end, she went on an interesting arc. And while I won’t say she completely redeemed herself, her evolution is worth exploring. Enjoy!
Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube
This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.
In this video, I revisit the series finale of Malcolm in the Middle. This groundbreaking sitcom did a lot of things differently over the course of seven seasons. But it had to navigate some unique challenges with the finale. It ended up being messy (literally), but uniquely satisfying.
Also, I started making this video before news came out about a finale/spin-off series. So, please keep that in mind.
Filed under Jack's World, television, YouTube
In general, I try not to discuss politics outside of appropriate spaces. And those spaces are usually small, confined, and located within areas where nobody close enough to punch one another. That’s not just a byproduct of having followed the news too closely for the past 10 years. I’ve just learned over the years that talking politics with random people is a quick way to make enemies, get angry, and generally lose what little faith in humanity you might have had.
There’s a time and a place to have political discussions. That time is almost never and that place is almost nowhere, unless you actively work in institutions that deal in such policies. You just have to be aware that certain discussions about certain issues are bound to get heated. And it’s next to impossible to change anyone’s mind about a particular position through these discussions.
However, in my personal experience, which I understand is limited, I’ve noticed there are a few hot-button topics that often double as red flags for certain people. It’s not that the topics themselves aren’t relevant. They usually are. But when certain people single them out as a major area of concern, it warrants a certain level of caution. Because many of those people may not be arguing in good faith.
There are many issues and topics like that. But one in particular, which has become relevant in multiple countries, has to do with falling birthrates. Now, in terms of the actual numbers, there is cause for concern. If you actually look up population trends in numerous countries, you’ll confirm that this is a global trend. And falling birthrates certainly do incur a host of social, political, and economic problems for any given society.
That being said, there’s a right way to approach this issue, as well a wrong/misguided/deeply disturbing way. The right way is more academic than political. You study the factors surrounding the trend. Analyze which of those factors are influenced by certain policies. Then, you take the appropriate prescriptive measures.
But that’s not the approach certain people make. I don’t want to name names, but most of these people are closely aligned with the conservative, right-wing, or reactionary part of the political spectrum. They also tend to be staunch traditionalists who argue society has deviated too much from the morals, values, and social norms we used to have. And addressing the problem of falling birthrates, along with a host of other problems, requires that society reverse that trend.
Now, the people making these points may very well be sincere. They may genuinely believe that people would be happier and more prosperous if they lived like we did in whatever nostalgic past era they idolize, whenever and wherever it might be.
However, in terms of the actual substance of this argument, it’s total bullshit.
And in terms of larger implications, it might even be a mask for a more nefarious agenda.
To understand why, it’s worth asking two important questions with respect to birthrates and those who obsess over it.
Question #1: Who benefits most directly from increasing birthrates?
Question #2: What other agenda does addressing this issue serve?
In the case of falling birthrates and ways to address it, there are certain policy prescriptions that tend to get emphasized over others. Those who like to frame declining birthrates as a serious issue tend not to talk much about the rising costs of childcare, housing, and food. They also tend not to talk much about the fact that wages, on a global scale, have remained relatively stagnant.
Instead, the reactionary crowd will highlight social issues like LGBTQ rights, declining marriage rates, feminism, and a lack of religious affiliation. Even if they touch on some of the economic issues, they won’t label them as a high priority. They’ll just frame women, teenagers, and sexual minorities as deviants or aberrations who are not contributing to society in a meaningful way.
They may claim they’re just concerned about the future of society. But in general, their concerns can often be boiled down to furthering draconian policies on women, workers, and young people. And the people and organizations who benefit are usually who you might expect.
Rich, well-connected business owners need a growing population to buy their products and/or get locked into their network of services.
Powerful, well-connected political organizations need a growing population to sustain the social and economic status quo that put them into power.
Religious organizations need a steady increase in population to ensure more adherents, which in turn means more influence and tax-free money for them.
The ones who don’t benefit are usually women who can’t access or afford family planning. It also negatively impacts LGBTQ+ communities because they’re denigrated for not contributing to the population/consumer/worker base. It also negatively effects workers who get stuck in cycles of poverty because they have too many kids that they cannot afford.
Again, this is not to say that falling birthrates aren’t an issue. There are certainly steps society can take to address this issue. And those steps will definitely vary from country to country. But for certain people of certain political leanings, it’s a cover for regressive, reactionary policies that benefit nobody except those who are already rich and powerful.
Be aware of that because, in most cases, serving the interests of those at the top of an imperfect system only hinders any efforts to address those imperfections.
Filed under abortion, political correctness, politics, sex in society
Back in 2017, I posed a question that I didn’t think would be answered for decades. I asked whether anyone would allow an artificial intelligence program to pick their spouse. Now, this was several years before ChatGPT came out. Like most everyone else, I had no idea that artificial intelligence was going to become mainstream in less than a decade.
There’s no question that a lot has happened in that span, so much so that it’s now a half-a-trillion dollar industry. This is no longer some futuristic sci-fi technology that most people alive today won’t see. AI is already here. If you have an internet connection, you can use it right now. Even if our best AI systems aren’t at human-level intelligence, that doesn’t mean they aren’t useful. Entire industries have emerged in recent years that either utilize or rely on AI.
But when it comes to our love life, I think the application of AI is inevitable. When I first asked the question, I made the point that AI has the benefit of analyzing data about people in a way that’s more objective and less prone to emotional manipulation. And in theory, more advanced AI systems can also account for someone’s emotional health when determining who is their ideal romantic partner.
I expected someone to come along and use AI for this purpose sooner or later. Well, it ended up being much sooner than expected.
Because the Tokyo government in Japan is officially launching a dating app that will utilize AI to help people find romantic partners. Now, make no mistake. This is not some overhyped tech startup or some online gimmick. This effort is a non-profit public initiative. Signing up is free, but users have to register, provide government identification, verify their income, and establish clearly that they are indeed single.
These steps aren’t just necessary for the sake of providing adequate data for the AI. This makes clear that the goal of this app isn’t to facilitate random hookups or provide a platform for porn stars to advertise their OnlyFans page. The goal is to actually help people get together, get married, and start families.
And for Japan, and many other industrialized countries, that’s an increasingly urgent issue. Marriage rates have been declining in Japan for years, along with birthrates. This has led to a serious demographic problem in which the population of Japan is declining and young people have shown little interest in dating.
The reasons for this trend are many. Between Japan’s insanely demanding work culture and gender politics, dating in the classical sense has become unfeasible. The effort it takes to find someone and date them just isn’t feasible for many young Japanese. But this is where AI can help.
So long as the AI has adequate data, it can factor in all of someone’s quirks, habits, personalities, and desires when matching them with someone else. While it’s doubtful any AI for any dating app has that kind of data at the moment, the incentives for Japan are actually what makes this a good idea. And if it has any measure of success, it would definitely be worth pursuing for other countries.
I’m comfortable saying this because I’ve used dating apps before. I know for a fact that they’re not designed to help people find their future spouse. Beyond having a massive gender imbalance that tends to favor women, the incentives for every dating service ensues they’ll never be good at helping people find love, even if they use advanced AI.
That’s because most every dating app relies on its users paying regular membership fees to turn a profit. And if the app works too well in that it helps people find that special someone, then those people have no reason to keep paying for a subscription. That’s why so many dating apps either become a mechanism for hook-ups or just a way to advertise porn sites.
Japan is taking those incentives out of the equation by making it a government run, not-for-profit enterprise. They’re not charging money. They’re charging time, information, and your personal energy. That helps ensure that the people who join this app actually want to find a good relationship. They provide the data. The AI provides the possible romantic connections.
Now, there’s no guarantee that the AI will be perfect at helping its users find their future spouse. In fact, I think there will be some growing pains with this dating service. Even if it attracts a large number of users, it’s going to need development, investment, and refinement.
But, like every new endeavor, it has to start somewhere. I think the early results for a non-profit AI dating app like this are certain to be mixed, at best. But if it starts working and there’s good research to back it up, then other countries facing similar problems would be wise to take notice.
And who knows? Maybe one day, an app like this will help me find my future wife.
Only time will tell.
Filed under Artificial Intelligence, futurism, romance
This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.
In this video, I make the case that, of all the jobs artificial intelligence could replace, CEO should be at the top of that list. In recent years, CEOs in general have generated headlines for all the wrong reasons. With the ongoing advancements in AI, this is one job for which we should be actively trying to remove human flaws.
Filed under Artificial Intelligence, Jack's World, television, YouTube