Tag Archives: technology

Personal Robots Are Now (Sort Of) Available

It’s a common futuristic trope. At some point, humanity develops robots that are capable of performing everyday household tasks. From Rosie in “The Jetsons” to the units in “I Robot,” they offer an enticing premise. They’re essentially a maid who doesn’t get tired, doesn’t have a bad attitude, and doesn’t inspire any guilt that may come from relegating certain people to service roles.

There’s a lot more to be said about why this trope exists. Some of it has implications that I’d rather not dwell on. But let’s not lie to ourselves. The idea of having a personal robot maid is appealing to many. That appeal extends beyond the possibility of sex robots, which are also a notable trope.

While the current state of sex robots is a different conversation, the concept of a personal robot is very relevant. The rise of artificial intelligence has already impacted robotics. It’s not enough to just create robots with the dexterity and nimbleness of a human. Companies like Boston Dynamics have been doing that for years.

But those robots are mostly just autonomous puppets. Their movements are either pre-programmed or controlled by a human. It’s still a critical component in the development of personal robots. But it’s not enough to make them viable.

Now, we may be at a point where such robots can be a real product. Earlier this year, a company called 1X introduced the first commercial personal robot.

They call it Neo. And it’s currently available for pre-order and the cost is steep at $20,000. Whether or not those orders are fulfilled remains to be seen. It’s possible this could be another Elon Musk style vaporware grift. However, it’s still relevant in that it marks another step.

This robot is certainly no Rosie. It’s also not the kind of robot you might see working in an Amazon warehouse. It feels like a first effort in creating a viable personal robot. Like the first cell phones of the 1980s, it’s a clunky novelty with limited function. This robot doesn’t have an AI that allows it to act independently. It’s actually teleoperated.

That means if or when you get one, it will have to connect remotely to a human operator to help it learn tasks. In a sense, Neo is like an entry level employee that requires extensive training. But it does have a measure of programming that allows it to learn, like your typical narrow AI. And once it learns well enough, it can perform tasks independently.

Those tasks can’t be overly complex. Things like doing the dishes, folding laundry, and cleaning a home is not all that complicated. With some learning, it can probably carry out those tasks about as well as a young teenager. But Neo also has some additional functionality. It can engage in conversations like a typical chatbot.

Couple this with its small stature and non-threatening look and this robot can be a companion, as well as a helper. Again, it’s not a sex robot. Expecting it to be that intimate is like expecting one of those bulky 80s cell phones to take dick pics. I still don’t doubt that will enter the equation at some point in this market. But this added element of connection is another step in the process.

Assuming these robots do actually get sold, it’ll open the doors to a new market. And whichever company gains that initial foothold will be primed to make billions. Say what you will about the current state of the AI industry and there is a lot to say. But it’s an industry full of potential profits for any company that’s capable of realizing them. Doing so will require a great deal of time, money, and investment.

But the incentives are in place. The technology is developing and improving. Fully capable personal robots won’t arrive all at once. Like any other technology, it has to go through a maturation process. But with Neo, that process might have officially begun.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, robots, Uncategorized

How AI Slop Will Evolve For Better AND For Worse

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

The development of artificial intelligence has incurred many consequences. But the most visible to date has been the emergence of “AI Slop.” It has flooded social media, including YouTube. And as generative AI continues to improve, the nature of this slop will evolve.

There are plenty of strong opinions about AI Slop, most of which are negative. I do share some of those opinions, but I also try to approach it with a balanced perspective in this video. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under AI Art, Artificial Intelligence, Jack's World, YouTube

The First (But Not Last) AI Actress Is A Thing

Have you heard of Tilly Norwood? She’s a beautiful young actress who is just starting to make her presence felt in Hollywood. She hasn’t been in much, but she’s already negotiating with talent agents to get bigger roles.

There’s just one major issue. Tilly Norwood isn’t a real person. She’s an entirely AI-generated persona.

Naturally, that doesn’t sit well with real life actors and unions. There is already a concerted effort to prevent Tilly Norwood from being cast in anything beyond your typical AI slop content. I completely understand this sentiment. I don’t blame anyone who works in Hollywood for being concerned about this. However, having covered the rise in AI for years, I’m comfortable making this prediction.

Tilly Norwood will eventually be cast in major movies and TV shows.

Other AI actors like her will be cast, as well.

Traditional actors and actresses will hate it. A sizable chunk of the audience will hate it as well. But this is going to happen. It was always going to happen the moment generative AI reached a certain level of refinement. A big reason for that involves money, as tends to be the case in Hollywood and most other industries. But there’s another reason that’s worth highlighting.

Dollar for dollar, movies and TV shows are getting more expensive to produce. This isn’t just due to inflation, unions, and the “personalities” that tend to comes with Hollywood. The logistics involved with making media has become bloated and inefficient. We’re no longer in an era in which media can only go through certain channels, be it TV and movie theaters. Thanks to streaming media, as well as online content like YouTube and Tiktok, the competition for eyeballs has never been greater.

Unless you’re a big budget blockbuster with a massive distribution network, such as Disney or Warner Bros., it’s harder to make content that turns a profit. The scale, resources, and personnel required to produce a movie or show is such that it’s limiting. Add to that the general enshitification of streaming media and the current model for producing content just isn’t sustainable.

Generative AI, as much as it is derided, offers a significant cost advantage. On top of that, an AI actor or actress is less likely to get accused of harassment, arrested for public intoxication, or go on some anti-sematic rant during a routine traffic stop. And for certain Hollywood agents, you can’t put a price on that kind of assurance.

But the question remains. Will audiences accept AI actors? Will the content they produce actually be worth watching?

A lot of people will probably refuse to watch anything with Tilly Norwood or anything like her out of principle. But what happens when AI gets to a point where it’s hard to tell if a person is AI generated? There are already AI tools like SORA and Veo3 that make extremely realistic videos of people who look and sound real. This is one element of AI that is not in the distant future. It’s here and it’s evolving fast.

It’s not yet clear what kind of career Tilly Norwood will have. She may never show up in anything mainstream. But like it or not, she marks the first step in a new trend with AI. We don’t know where it will lead. Hollywood is already undergoing significant change. Technology like this is only going to accelerate that change in ways we can’t imagine.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, movies, technology, television

A Message Regarding Teachers, Students, And ChatGPT

When I was a student in high school, the internet was just starting to mature. More and more people were able to access it. Teachers and students alike began using it. Initially, it was a novelty. But once certain sites and programs emerged, namely Wikipedia, it garnered serious concern among teachers and administrators.

I still remember multiple teachers advising us to not use Wikipedia for any assignment. A few even warned us that, if they found out we just copied text from it, then that would result in an immediate failing grade.

As for the administrators, their concern was that it would completely undermine the traditional process for doing research. That usually involved going to a library, searching for the relevant books, sifting through those books, and taking detailed notes on the information within.

Yes, that process was cumbersome and archaic.

Yes, I regularly utilized that process.

Yes, it sucked as much as you think.

Eventually, the attitude shifted. When I was in my second year of college, more and more of my professors changed their attitude towards using sites like Wikipedia. They saw the value in using it to teach a subject. They still advised students to avoid using it as a sole reference point. But they didn’t actively deter or punish students from using it.

I bring this up because it seems a new generation of students and teachers is dealing with a similar situation with AI. And even though I’m not in school anymore, I can already surmise that this will be far more impactful than Wikipedia ever was. AI has already changed the way students and schools approach homework. It’s also changing the way teachers are approaching teaching, in general.

Now, it’s still too early to know whether AI will be a net benefit or a net negative with respect to educating students. But the overall sentiment towards AI, at least among teachers, is mostly negative. The reasons for this attitude vary, but it’s not that different from the reasons my old teachers gave for discouraging Wikipedia.

It’s doing too much of the work for the students. It’s essentially doing the thinking for them in terms summarizing the material, producing essays, or answering questions. The concern is that it’ll hinder students’ ability to develop critical thinking skills. Because if they can just let the AI do the work for them, why bother? The AI can do what they otherwise would’ve done in seconds.

I certainly don’t doubt that this concern is sincere. I have family members and close relatives who work as teachers. This is going to affect them, regardless of their attitudes towards AI. I imagine numerous teachers, schools, and administrators are going to resist utilizing this technology at every turn. Others will embrace it to the utmost because it could potentially make their jobs easier. Given the inherent stresses of teaching children at any age, could you honestly blame them?

To both those groups of educators, as well as the students currently coming of age, I have a message that I’d like to impart. And should I ever have kids of my own, I suspect this message will affect them too.

Embracing AI will ultimately be more productive than resisting it.

It’s not a warning or advice. It’s just a simple statement. I’m not just saying it because I generally support the development of AI. I’m simply speaking from experience.

That experience is heavily influenced by the fact that I was generally miserable in school. I did not care much for middle school or high school. And I certainly wouldn’t say that I learned as much as I’d hoped during that experience. If anything, the way school went about teaching me just didn’t work. The only thing I ever “learned” in school was how to pass tests. That’s not the same as learning something.

In college, things were different. Yes, there were still tests and exams to study for. However, there was more freedom and flexibility to learn about the things that interested me. That helped make college an overall better experience while helping me develop skills that served me well in my adult life.

But in any case, I can also say without reservation that if ChatGPT had been available to me, I definitely would’ve used it. It would’ve been very helpful in terms of summarizing notes, chapters in a textbook, or breaking down certain concepts I didn’t understand. And yes, I probably would’ve used it to help me with my homework, polish my essays, or study for exams. Would that have made me less knowledgeable? Would I have ended up learning less, as a result?

I honestly don’t think so. Because if I’m interested in something, I’ll seek out more information that’s beyond the assignment. I’ll look for things outside the textbook or the syllabus. And if that ends up helping me with an exam or a lecture, then that’s just a bonus.

I suspect there are plenty of other kids like that. Kids, in general, are pretty curious. If they’re interested in something, they’ll pursue it. Sometimes, teachers don’t have the time, energy, or willingness to teach them beyond what the school allows or assigns. Other times, parents aren’t able to teach them because they either don’t know enough about it or just don’t have the time.

AI can fill that gap that will only widen as more schools struggle to find capable teachers. Given how bureaucratic the education system is, especially in America, there aren’t many feasible options outside of AI. Resisting it won’t work in the long run. Resisting technology of any kind rarely works.

It may even get to a point where students primarily learn major skills through AI. It’s already happening on a small scale in some areas. That trend is likely to accelerate as AI continues to improve. The incentives are in place. The need is certainly there. There may be those who don’t like the idea of kids being taught primarily by a non-human AI. They may have concerns that are entirely warranted.

But in the end, AI is here to stay. It’s capable of filling an important need at a time when knowledge, education, and critical thinking skills have never been more important. If the current education system cannot meet that demand, then we’ll need tools like AI. Without it, the students will ultimately pay the price.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence

Jack’s CreepyPastas: God Talked To Me Through An AI Chatbot

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

This video is a CreepyPasta story I wrote and narrated myself about an AI with a direct connection to the Almighty. Enjoy!

Leave a comment

Filed under CreepyPasta, horror, YouTube

Google Just Created An AI That Makes Videos And The World Will Never Be The Same

In recent years, it has become routine for tech companies to overhype up their latest artificial intelligence technology. Ever since the rise of ChatGPT, the market for this technology has expanded faster than anything I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. It’s not unreasonable to surmise that AI will be a multi-trillion-dollar industry in the coming decades.

But I’m also old enough to remember the dot-com bubble. I haven’t forgotten what happens when hype exceeds capabilities. And, as remarkable as these emerging AI systems are, their capabilities are still limited. Whether it’s large language models or image generators, these AI systems are a long way from becoming Skynet. They’re certainly part of the ongoing development to create Artificial General Intelligence, but that leap is not imminent. That would be like jumping from rotary phones to iPhones.

However, AI is different from the dot-com bubble or any other overhyped product for that matter. I’ve said before that AI has the potential to change the world in ways we literally cannot imagine. That potential is far from being realized, but there’s a good chance people my age will live long enough to see it play out.

Well, recently a bit more of that potential was realized. Google, a company that is very active in the development of AI, released a new generative AI tool called Veo3. Like other generative AI tools, this particular tool specializes in creating full videos from text prompts. It’s not the first tool of its kind. However, based on some of the videos that have come out from Veo3, it’s definitely a step forward in terms of quality. If you need proof, check these videos out.

Remember, the content in this video is entirely AI. It never happened.

I’m not gonna lie. I did not expect these videos to look this realistic. With other AI video generators, you can usually tell it’s not real. Between the glitchy movements and the uncanny valley effect, not many people would mistake those videos as real.

But Veo3 has taken it to another level. If I didn’t know ahead of time that this content was fake, I might have just shrugged and accepted it. And that’s a major threshold that we cannot uncross with this technology. Because when it suddenly becomes possible to create videos that look as real as anything taken in real life, how can we trust any video?

Make no mistake. This won’t just be used to flood the internet with advertisements and mindless entertainment. Someone is going to use this technology maliciously. There’s a good chance someone is already doing so as we speak.

At this very moment, you can use Veo3. It is expensive, as many advanced AI tools tend to be. But if you’re determined to make a certain video for a certain purpose, be it malicious or altruistic, is $250 really that high a price? I know people who have spent more on skins in Fortnite.

And Veo3 is not the apex of generative AI. It’s going to keep improving. The incentives are too strong. Google might have the best video generator now, but other multi-billion-dollar companies who want a piece of that AI market will fight to take that title.

Maybe OpenAI will upgrade Sora.

Maybe Microsoft will upgrade its Copilot AI.

Maybe a company like Apple will make a big leap, just like they did with smartphones years ago.

But no matter which company makes the next best AI video generator, the technology will improve. It’s going to become increasingly difficult to tell when something is real or fake. There are likely going to be laws and policies that attempt to regulate this kind of AI. But governments have been historically slow at keeping up with technology. And the advancement of AI is likely to accelerate.

I certainly don’t claim to know what kind of impact Veo3 will have in the short-term. I already make YouTube videos on my own. Will my kind of content become obsolete or unable to compete? Will video sites everywhere become overwhelmed or bloated because of content generated by Veo3?

Then, there’s the long-term impact. What happens to major studios once this technology allows them to make movies and shows faster, cheaper, and without paying actual people? That’s an issue I once thought was decades away. Now, it might be relevant within a few years.

Only time will tell what sort of changes this technology will incur. But if what Veo3 has demonstrated is any indication, these changes are coming a lot sooner than expected.

1 Comment

Filed under AI Art, Artificial Intelligence, YouTube

We’re Testing AI By Having It Play Pokémon (And I’m All For It)

Years ago, I found myself caught up in the first Pokémon craze. And I am not ashamed to admit that I fueled that craze in my own special way.

For a couple of years, I put played the game for hours on end on my Gameboy, so much so that I would buy packs of AA batteries to ensure I never ran out. I was not just content with beating the game. I wasn’t even content trying to “catch ’em all.” From red to blue to yellow to silver to gold, I wanted to master every last bit of those games.

Even after all these years, I regret nothing. Those were hours well spent.

But I’m not just bringing up Pokémon for the sake of nostalgia. Recently, it became relevant for an unexpected, but intriguing reason. And it has to do with artificial intelligence.

I know AI has been in the news a lot in recent years, for better and for worse. But it’s definitely newsworthy because this technology is advancing at an incredible pace. It’s no longer this novelty gizmo that can win at games like chess, Go, or pong. Even if it doesn’t have human level intelligence, AI is changing the world. And the pace of that change is likely to accelerate.

It’s now at a point where gauging the advancing capabilities of AI is increasingly difficult. For years, the Turing Test was considered the primary means of testing an AI. But even that has proven limited and incomplete.

That’s where Pokémon comes in. I know that sounds like a weird segway, but it’s actually appropriate. I would even argue that this is a better way to measure the capabilities of an AI.

At this very moment, an AI model called Claude is being tasked with playing the classic version of Pokémon Red. There are even occasional livestreams of it. Having played that game multiple times and beaten it in every way possible, I am genuinely in favor of this. The fact that Claude has been struggling to beat this game, sometimes in hilarious ways, only proves that test has merit.

That’s because Pokémon, as a game, is very different from other games that AI has played. It’s not linear in that the point is to get a character from Point A to Point B, like in Mario, Metroid, or Donkey Kong. It also doesn’t have straightforward rules like Jeopardy, Go, or chess. Pokémon games are a lot more open ended. They’re also a lot more random.

There’s no one way to assemble, train, and develop a team of Pokémon that help you beat every gym and defeat the Elite 4. There are also multiple options on how to start the game. Your first choice is to pick a starter Pokémon in Squirtle, Charmander, or Bulbasaur.

From there, you deal with numerous random encounters in certain areas. And if you try rushing into a match against a gym leader or Team Rocket, you’re likely to lose, even if you use perfect strategy.

It’s also not enough to simply know the map and understand where everything is located. It also takes a measure of planning, patience, and resource management. You need to know which Pokémon to train, which skills to teach, and which matchups are most advantageous.

These are all capabilities that AI has not developed beyond a certain point. There’s a complexity to the game and its mechanics that it has yet to grasp. It shows in just how much the AI has struggled thus far. As I’m writing this, no AI has been able to beat Pokemon in terms of defeating the Elite Four. At times, it has even gotten completely stuck.

That doesn’t mean the AI is a failure or in some ways flawed. It just means that it’s incomplete. It’s not yet at a level where it can process tasks of a certain scope and compelxity. It’s like a child that has learned to walk, but can’t run at a sustained pace. That’s likely to change and change quickly. It’s only a matter of time before an AI like Claude finally beats Pokemon. But after that, what next?

That’s a difficult question to answer at the moment. There are plenty of other games out there that have more compelx mechancis than classic versions of Pokemon. But at some point, playing games just isn’t going to be enough for an AI. Even if it gets to a point where it can beat any video game, that doesn’t mean we’ve achieved a superhuman level of AI. It just means we’ve got an AI that is capable of more complex tasks.

That has many possibilities and implications. But for now, we can only speculate. In the meantime, we can also watch as our best AI tries to catch ’em all. Some might be cheering for it. Others may hope it keeps failing. We don’t yet know when or whether an AI will achieve the coveted title of Pokemon Master. But if it ever does, then chances are it’ll be ready to become a master at many other challenges.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, video games

A Brief Message To Owners Of A Tesla

First off, I get it.

I understand why you bought your Tesla. For a time, it was one of the coolest cars you could own. It was the first electric car that succeeded. It had so many forces working against it from the beginning. But it found a way to seize a sizeable chunk of the car market.

Without the Telsa, America’s current infrastructure for electric vehicles wouldn’t be where it’s at. It used to be exceedingly rare to see charging stations. Before 2020, I only ever saw them at truck stops and rest stops along major highways. Now, I see them pretty much everywhere, from shopping centers to malls to residential buildings.

That is a good thing, overall. We, as a society, should move away from gas powered vehicles. It’s not just better for the environment. These cars are simpler and easier to maintain, having fewer moving parts and points of failure. And with battery technology improving by leaps and bounds every year, electric vehicles are poised to become better than gas-powered cars in every measurable way.

All that being said, it’s worth remembering that owning a Tesla also means supporting a man like Elon Musk. As someone who used to admire the man, I don’t blame you for sharing that sentiment. He cultivated a brand on top of a cult of personality for years. But then, after COVID-19, he underwent a transformation that either changed him or simply revealed who he always was. And who he is now is not someone worth supporting.

He is not the real life version of Tony Stark.

He is not the man who will take us to the stars.

He’s a lying, thin-skinned, hypocritical, greedy narcassist who treats his workers like shit, breaks promises, and is so lacking in self-awareness that it’s dangerous.

The fact that this man now has access and power capable of undermining nations, wars, and peoples’ livelihoods should be cause for concern. To aid him is to enable a man who is so insecure, shallow, and dense that he won’t think twice about parroting Nazi talking points and racist conspiracy theories. That means he’s either so stupid that he doesn’t know the harm he’s doing or he’s always been a bigoted piece of shit and he’s just not hiding it anymore.

Whatever the case, owning and supporting Tesla will indirectly support him. That doesn’t mean you should try to sell your Tesla right now. If you bought it before you knew the kind of man that Musk was, then I don’t blame you. That’s not on you and you don’t deserve scorn for that.

However, if you bought your Tesla knowing this about him and actually want to support him, then I do blame you. You’re not just supporting an egotistical sociopath who would gladly burn the planet to a crisp if it meant saving his entitled ass. You’re actively helping make the world a worse place for everyone not rich, well-connected, and incapable of basic empathy.

What you choose to do with your Tesla, knowing who it’s supporting, is entirely up to you. I’ll continue supporting electric cars. I’m also actively rooting for other automakers to usurp Tesla’s dominance and tank the stock price of the company to which so much of Musk’s wealth is tied.

I’m also hoping his reactionary, Nazi-like antics catch up with him at some point. He might never go broke, but we can collectively make sure his name is reviled and scorned for generations to come. That might be the only way people like him ever face any consequences for what he does.

Lastly, if you actually bought a Tesla Truck, then you have no excuses. You’re either an idiot who got conned by a wannabe tech bro or you’re just a douche-bag who wants to let the world know it.

Leave a comment

Filed under futurism, technology

Japan Is Launching An AI Dating App (And Why It’s A Good Idea)

Back in 2017, I posed a question that I didn’t think would be answered for decades. I asked whether anyone would allow an artificial intelligence program to pick their spouse. Now, this was several years before ChatGPT came out. Like most everyone else, I had no idea that artificial intelligence was going to become mainstream in less than a decade.

There’s no question that a lot has happened in that span, so much so that it’s now a half-a-trillion dollar industry. This is no longer some futuristic sci-fi technology that most people alive today won’t see. AI is already here. If you have an internet connection, you can use it right now. Even if our best AI systems aren’t at human-level intelligence, that doesn’t mean they aren’t useful. Entire industries have emerged in recent years that either utilize or rely on AI.

But when it comes to our love life, I think the application of AI is inevitable. When I first asked the question, I made the point that AI has the benefit of analyzing data about people in a way that’s more objective and less prone to emotional manipulation. And in theory, more advanced AI systems can also account for someone’s emotional health when determining who is their ideal romantic partner.

I expected someone to come along and use AI for this purpose sooner or later. Well, it ended up being much sooner than expected.

Because the Tokyo government in Japan is officially launching a dating app that will utilize AI to help people find romantic partners. Now, make no mistake. This is not some overhyped tech startup or some online gimmick. This effort is a non-profit public initiative. Signing up is free, but users have to register, provide government identification, verify their income, and establish clearly that they are indeed single.

These steps aren’t just necessary for the sake of providing adequate data for the AI. This makes clear that the goal of this app isn’t to facilitate random hookups or provide a platform for porn stars to advertise their OnlyFans page. The goal is to actually help people get together, get married, and start families.

And for Japan, and many other industrialized countries, that’s an increasingly urgent issue. Marriage rates have been declining in Japan for years, along with birthrates. This has led to a serious demographic problem in which the population of Japan is declining and young people have shown little interest in dating.

The reasons for this trend are many. Between Japan’s insanely demanding work culture and gender politics, dating in the classical sense has become unfeasible. The effort it takes to find someone and date them just isn’t feasible for many young Japanese. But this is where AI can help.

So long as the AI has adequate data, it can factor in all of someone’s quirks, habits, personalities, and desires when matching them with someone else. While it’s doubtful any AI for any dating app has that kind of data at the moment, the incentives for Japan are actually what makes this a good idea. And if it has any measure of success, it would definitely be worth pursuing for other countries.

I’m comfortable saying this because I’ve used dating apps before. I know for a fact that they’re not designed to help people find their future spouse. Beyond having a massive gender imbalance that tends to favor women, the incentives for every dating service ensues they’ll never be good at helping people find love, even if they use advanced AI.

That’s because most every dating app relies on its users paying regular membership fees to turn a profit. And if the app works too well in that it helps people find that special someone, then those people have no reason to keep paying for a subscription. That’s why so many dating apps either become a mechanism for hook-ups or just a way to advertise porn sites.

Japan is taking those incentives out of the equation by making it a government run, not-for-profit enterprise. They’re not charging money. They’re charging time, information, and your personal energy. That helps ensure that the people who join this app actually want to find a good relationship. They provide the data. The AI provides the possible romantic connections.

Now, there’s no guarantee that the AI will be perfect at helping its users find their future spouse. In fact, I think there will be some growing pains with this dating service. Even if it attracts a large number of users, it’s going to need development, investment, and refinement.

But, like every new endeavor, it has to start somewhere. I think the early results for a non-profit AI dating app like this are certain to be mixed, at best. But if it starts working and there’s good research to back it up, then other countries facing similar problems would be wise to take notice.

And who knows? Maybe one day, an app like this will help me find my future wife.

Only time will tell.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, futurism, romance

Why AI SHOULD Replace Most CEOs

This is a video from my YouTube channel, Jack’s World.

In this video, I make the case that, of all the jobs artificial intelligence could replace, CEO should be at the top of that list. In recent years, CEOs in general have generated headlines for all the wrong reasons. With the ongoing advancements in AI, this is one job for which we should be actively trying to remove human flaws.

Leave a comment

Filed under Artificial Intelligence, Jack's World, television, YouTube